Macroeconomic Monitor
Начало / Стоян Панчев (страница 19)

Stoyan Panchev

Stoyan Panchev graduated from Sofia University and the University of London. He worked at the Institute of Economic Affairs, London and the Institute for Market Economics, Sofia. Chairman of the Bulgarian Libertarian Society. Co-founder of the Expert Club for Economics and Politics (EKIP). Lecturer at Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"

DSB does not make a big left turn*

After reviewing the economic programs of three parties – GERB, BSP and DBG – in the previous issue of the weekly bulletin, we continue the review with the recently published document by “Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria” (DSB). To some extent, the policies set out in it are surprising as more market-oriented than we would have expected, following the recent appearances of individuals …

More »

The President and the Scientists

Amidst the fuss surrounding the fall of the government and the search for a new cabinet, President Plevneliev's meeting with the leadership of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences somehow remained aside. The main topic of conversation was the planned operational program for science - an initiative that will be among the worst things that can happen ...

More »

Where do innovations in education come from?*

Bulgarian society is paying increasing attention not only to the key role of entrepreneurs in the economy, but also to their positive impact on our environment. However, an important group of innovators is often overlooked, who are trying with all their might to change a cumbersome and dysfunctional system, without waiting for permission...

More »

Politics in American and Bulgarian

Today (03.01.2012) is an important day for American politics. In the small agricultural state of the Midwest - Iowa - the primary elections for delegates to the Republican National Convention are being held. This year the vote is especially important because it will determine who will fight Barack Obama in the upcoming …

More »

Property rights and the environment

Since there is no social optimum and any decision about common resources will be the result of political pressure (such as the protests) or parliamentary servility to certain special interests (such as the changes in the law), we can conclude that public ownership of resources has a fundamental problem.

More »