Macroeconomic Monitor
Home / Economy / The Bankruptcies of the Communist Economy

The bankruptcies of the communist economy

 

Even today, the thesis continues to exist that Bulgaria's economy flourished in the period 1945-1990. And even that Todor Zhivkov's rule was positive, as a recent study indicates. In this article, we will examine some statistical, historical, and economic sources to see if this is the case.

The bankruptcy in 1960

Regarding the first bankruptcy of the communist government, it is worth quoting at length the investigative journalist Hristo Hristov, author of the website desebg.com.1 There we read:

"The economic situation in communist Bulgaria in the late 1950s was so bad that the country was brought to bankruptcy. Due to the systematic failure to implement annual plans and incompetent management, Zhivkov brought the country to insolvency. In 1960, the country's foreign debt reached an unbearable amount of almost 3 billion leva for that time. The government fell into a state that did not allow it to repay the loans received from the USSR, the largest creditor of the communist government at that time.

The issue of indebtedness to Soviet banks based in Paris and London, as well as to the State Bank in Moscow, became urgent. In April 1960, in a strictly confidential report, the Chairman of the Bulgarian National Bank, Kiril Nestorov, warned the top party leadership:

“The country’s liabilities in capitalist currency, from $115 million at the beginning of the year, reached $134 million at the end of March. Eurobank, Paris, and the Moscow People’s Bank, London, have informed us that they are unable to grant us new trade credits until we reduce the amount of those used so far. Any non-payment could expose the two friendly banks, as well as the State Bank of the USSR, to risk.”

The BNB also proposes ... measures, expressed in cuts and savings of foreign exchange. However, the bank concludes that even "they are not able to completely resolve the issue of our payments with capitalist countries this year."

In the archives ... about the economic catastrophe, a draft of a letter to the First Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU and Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev from Zhivkov and Yugov has been preserved. It states: [a]:

"At the end of 1959, the total amount of our liabilities reached $115 million. Due to the lack of foreign exchange reserves, our liabilities at the end of the first quarter of 1960 reached $129 million, of which $44 million was due in the second quarter and $35 million in the third quarter of 1960."

The obligations are as follows:

  • $60 million to Banque Commercial pour L'Europe du Nord, Paris;
  • $20 million to the Moscow National Bank, London;
  • $18 million to West German banks;
  • $6 million to Italian banks;
  • $25 million in corporate loans.

Thus, as a result of the financial collapse of the People's Republic of Bulgaria, in 1960 the country's gold reserve, amounting to 24 tons, was exported and then sold. The amount that the People's Republic of Bulgaria received in exchange for its gold was $22,738,255. Not a cent of the transaction went to the treasury. Moreover: "The deal with the gold reserve saved Zhivkov, who understood that without the benefits of Soviet economic assistance he would not be able to govern and remain in power. This largely motivated his proposal in 1963 for the People's Republic of Bulgaria to "merge" with the USSR.

The semi-bankruptcy in 1977

We will again refer to desebg.com for the second, again little-known, bankruptcy of communism: "In 1977, when as a result of throwing huge funds into the development of heavy engineering and the rise in international oil prices, the People's Republic of Bulgaria again fell into a debt crisis with over 6 billion dollars in debts, including to Western banks.

The situation was saved thanks to the benevolent attitude of the then Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, who provided financial assistance to Zhivkov's government, but at the same time warned him that financial debts would sooner or later become a political problem."

We must make the important clarification that economically speaking, the country is in technical bankruptcy, which did not occur de facto by chance.

Photo 1: A report showing the failure to fulfill the foreign exchange revenue plan and the higher expenses with which Zhivkov maintains the illusion of the good life under socialism

spravka

Source: State Security.com

The bankruptcy of 1987-90

For the most recent bankruptcy of the economy by the Bulgarian Communist Party, we will quote Krasen Stanchev: "Bulgaria's bankruptcy of March 1990 was more severe also due to the collapse of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) and the loss of a market for the "great Bulgarian industries." Comparing it to the Greek bankruptcy of the last few years, he continues: "Both the Greek and Bulgarian (1990) bankruptcies are before private creditors and are the same as a share of the gross domestic product (GDP). The other similarities are simply striking:

  • At its core is the desire to keep the ruling parties in power; in Bulgaria at that time, one party was in power and this made things worse;
  • Creditors believe that the EU and the USSR will always be on hand to support the balance of payments; the Bulgarian debt is “guaranteed” by the division of labor in the CMEA, and the Greek debt – by transfers from the EU budget;
  • "Solidarity" and "mutual aid" are the political rhetoric that supports the irresponsible behavior of the authorities."

As a result of the bankruptcy in the late 1980s, "[t]he decline in GDP in 1990 was 9.1%, in 1991 – 11.7%, in 1992 – 7.3%, in 1996 – 9.4% and in 1997 – 5.6%"

The debt itself was accumulated in the period from 1976-1978 to 1988. Between 1984 and 1989 alone, the gross external debt increased more than three times, from 2.9 to 10.7 billion US dollars. In 1987, "the chairman of the Bulgarian National Bank, Vasil Kolarov, personally reported to Zhivkov that the servicing of the NRB's indebtedness to Western banks exceeded 100 percent of the country's total foreign exchange earnings." Hristo Hristov writes: "In 1987, Zhivkov did not decide to destroy the "tower of illusions" of socialism and continued to accumulate new debts, which in 1989 were already - external debt over 11 billion dollars and 26 billion leva internal debt, including the total indebtedness of agriculture, electronics and the military-industrial complex."

Naturally, these debts could not be serviced and the NRB became insolvent. This led Lukanov to declare a moratorium on payments. At the same time, the debt escalated to $13.889 billion in 1993, and payments on it continue to this day.

Here we will quote Krasen Stanchev again: "A careful reading of Todor Zhivkov's rule and the problems it created reveals a systematic creation of a false economy. Any economy in which people think they are getting rich, but quickly turn out to be actually getting poorer, is false. The common denominator of these years of economic underdevelopment is the criminalization of business, the state, and the economic imagination of politicians and citizens. This way of thinking about the economy, based on the principle of "what and how to steal", still dominates economic policy and its explanations."

Conclusion

Even without talking about the complete collapse of all branches of the economy, social security, agriculture, mass crimes against humanity and abuses of the local population, the colossal destruction of nature, etc., our assessment of the rule of Todor Zhivkov and the Bulgarian Communist Party as a whole is highly negative. In conclusion, we can say that the centrally planned economy of Bulgaria during communism was not only not stable and growing, but even the opposite. It was somehow forced to survive, from bankruptcy to bankruptcy, with part of the debts being paid off to this day. The rule of the paternally called "Dad" was not beneficial, but a complete disaster that affects our well-being even 25 years later.

Did you like it? Take a minute to support the EKIP on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

About Daniel Vassilev

Read more

The Aristocratic Candidate

The latest election ad by Vasil Terziev that I came across seems to be starting to adapt the right rhetoric. …

11 коментара

  1. Why isn't a parallel drawn between the ruined Bulgarian economy and the flourishing American one for the same period, which is what is being talked about in the brainwashing called "objective journalism"? These same Americans have always had a foreign debt measured in TRILLIONS, but they have not yet gone bankrupt.

    • Because even with trillions of combined external and internal debt, it is not over 100% of GDP and besides, they pay their interest regularly. While the NRB did not pay, because it could not 🙂

  2. And I don't know how many times we went bankrupt, but almost everything was free - healthcare, education, various trainings, union holidays and various other things, and the debt was 11 billion, and now in one year I don't know how much it is, and we are as poor as the biggest poor people, that's just how we are.

    • "Free"??? It was free for you, for those whose fields, cows, workshops, dairies were taken and "voluntarily" pushed into the TKZS or directly into their camps, it was quite salty. The fact that we are mired in misery today is a natural continuation of these 45 years of theft, corruption, scoundrelism, destroyed private business, incompetence in the management of large enterprises and the entire state. Moreover, the children of the directors and socialist leaders still eat and drink with the people's money, and many of them still "lead" Bulgaria in sweet state positions. The USSR collapsed not because of external intervention, but thanks to the complete incompetence and incompetence of the authorities. As your favorite leader Zhivkov said - "conducted by us". The directors of the factories "privatized" them, i.e. they stole bricks and fittings from the factories at will. And you wonder today why we are in this mess???!!!!

      • I don't know how many times the country has gone bankrupt, but we haven't understood - that's the trick, not to bring your people right to a begging stick in order to fill the state treasury, besides, now our debts are nearly 30 billion - find the differences, as they say! Besides, bankruptcy means nothing more than an official announcement that the debts cannot be paid and that's it - it doesn't mean that we will stop eating or die. Now, for your father Boyko to brag about, about 50% of the population is in a terrible situation - walk around the country and then tell me again that it was worse before, and now we have blossomed.

      • Exactly in 10 floors

  3. Sevdalin Kamburov

    It's worse now......and there are many more thieves!!!

  4. I was left with my mouth open! KRASEN STANCHEV will be envied by both the "insolent" and the "smart and beautiful"... This one is the king of opinion according to the circumstances! I have never read such fabricated and finger-sucked nonsense! I will buy a chameleon and name him K.S.

  5. How come you didn't understand - have you forgotten about the electricity and food stamps already? They are precisely because of the bankruptcy...