Author: Stefan Kichev
During Donald Trump's presidential campaign last year, we witnessed a new phenomenon in American political culture, which, to some extent, was also transmitted to Europe via the Internet. And which, according to many analysts, had a key role in the victory of the now current US president.
What is the alt-right movement?
This phenomenon represented a broad mass of supporters, as well as intellectual leaders, who campaigned for Trump, mostly on social media, and have recently begun holding political rallies. They are all united by a diverse set of values, but at the root of the problem is the belief that white people as a collective group are losing their influence in Western society. Often, this belief rests on assumptions that can be described as racist.
The movement got its name from the media – alt -right, which is short for “alternative right.” There has been a lot of talk about the alt-right lately (especially in the context of the recent riots in Charlottesville), and mostly it is the social aspect of the ideology that is exposed and deeply criticized, i.e. the racial prejudices that are glaring and give it an ugly and narrow-minded look.
The alt-right could be called Nazism, but those who call it that forget that the word carries with it more content than what they usually imagine - just the racist element. Nazism is a shortened version of "national socialism", in which the second part of the word states the economic theory of the ideology in question.
Nazism is not only a racial ideology, but also an economic one.
We could argue about which aspect of an ideology is the most important, but it is certainly possible to agree that economic theory occupies a large part and is of vital importance. It is rare to find criticism of the economic theory of the Nazis, because if it were to be presented in detail, the similarities with many of today's socialist parties would be obvious. A striking example is the Labour Party in England under the leadership of the far-left Jeremy Corbyn.
Hitler, like Corbyn, wanted to nationalize major sectors of the economy and keep banking under national control. State-guaranteed healthcare and education were also prominent in the economic program of the German Workers' Party (NSDAP). All policies that are now a permanent fixture in the political program of almost every left-wing party around the world, including the Democratic Party in the United States.
All this, of course, was given a racist tinge through the Aryan racial theory and its ruthless objectification in obscurantist laws that sent millions of innocent people to the prisons and camps of the Nazi state. But the two aspects of a given ideology are strongly intertwined with each other, and this is of crucial importance; one could even say that an ideology in its entirety represents the skillful practical symbiosis - objectification through laws - of its political philosophy and economic theory.
Nazism is a form of totalitarian socialism
The Nazis' dictatorial style of rule, as well as their barbaric self-dealing with their opponents and critics, was not caused solely by the fact that they were racist – such state arbitrariness went hand in hand with socialist property grabbing.
From the same belief that stems from the claim and attitude of the state towards the citizen according to the Nazis, i.e. total subordination to the state, which actually allows for the SS arbitrariness over minority groups, also stems from the conviction that the state apparatus, headed by a far-sighted omnipotent planner, can dispose of and distribute your property better than you yourself. In the same way that the principle of individual freedom is inextricably linked to the right to private property, i.e. how you dispose of your person and decide to express yourself is as much your right as the right to freely dispose of these privileges over your property.
The Nazis' dictatorial style of rule, as well as their barbaric self-dealing with their opponents and critics, was not caused solely by the fact that they were racists – such state tyranny goes hand in hand with socialist property grabbing. In fact, the connection between the two mentalities – the idea that you have the right and ability to dispose of other people's property better than others, and the idea that you and your race/ethnic group are inherently superior to others – is obvious.
The alt-right, or alternative right, is a dangerous, criminal, and collectivist ideology that bears a striking resemblance to Nazism, not simply because its rhetoric is filled with racist rhetoric; but because, at a more fundamental level, it shares a socialist view of the role of the state, which is always backed up by violence against the collective enemies of the economically disadvantaged class (or race).
Related literature:
Zhelyu Zhelev - Fascism
Jared Taylor - White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century
Hans Herman Hoppe - Theory of Socialism and Capitalism
Henry D. Aiken - The Age of Ideology
EKIP– Expert Club for Economics and Politics A Different Opinion



No logic in the article. It's as if racism cannot exist in a right-wing ideology. All the Nazis from Notice - Unite the Right are right-wing, shouting against the left and waving yellow-black flags. Not to mention that 90% of the BLO are Trump alt-right fan boys.
All this verbiage is to make it seem like ultra-libertarians are not libertarians. Fact check - many of them declare themselves to be such, which does not stop them from being Hitler admirers. As for historical facts, Hitler declared socialism and communism to be his main enemies, and economically supported private capital, especially large capital.
Hitler himself said that the best feature of the NSDAP's economic program was that it had no economic program. Nationalization was aimed solely at the Jews. Yes, he wasn't a libertarian, but that's not necessary, is it?
Libertarians are strange people. You simultaneously consider yourself patriots and conservatives, and at the same time you are for a zero role for the state. Well, how can there be a strong state without it having powers? Without limiting the monopoly position of those like Lukoil? Without collecting taxes with which to maintain the objects and subjects of national security such as the army, police, administration, education, health system, etc.? How can you be oriented towards the national, and at the same time your state does not have a toolkit through which to observe the national interest? I'm sorry, but these are complete absurdities.
I am a right-wing person, a total anti-communist, a patriot, a conservative, but that is precisely why I am against the final market. We do not live in the jungle, sorry. There is a reason why I was born white, blue-eyed, Bulgarian, Christian. Traditions must be respected and a balance must be achieved between them and progress. Everyone is equal only before the law, but everyone also deserves a chance.